Print  RSS 
Dec 9

Written by:
12/9/2008 10:18 AM 

It's interesting to see the developing nature of multicast programming, like the announcement yesterday that a radio upstart -- whippersnapper KDKA -- is airing the content of its AM outlet on the HD3 channels of three CBS Radio FMs in town. (KDKA itself went digital on its 50 kW signal at 1020 in May.)

One of the "subchannels" on each CBS FM in Pittsburgh (WBZW, WDSY and WZPT) now simulcasts KDKA. That's a lot of duplication, if you ask me; if multicast is about offering listeners "more choices," I'm not sure rebroadcasting the same content on four different radio channels in the market fulfills that goal. This is about choice of frequency, not choice of content. But give cluster managers credit for trying various ways of using their new infrastructure and for promoting their multicast offerings.

We're seeing more of this kind of thing as big broadcasters look at their existing pools of branded content, their new outlet channels and their desire to populate those channels affordably while making money off them or at least holding the space while the receiver market catches up.

But I still feel that multicasting is like the FM of the 1960s and that too many radio managers are overlooking the spectrum gold they're sitting on. How badly do you wish you could travel back in time and bamboozle an FM frequency from one of those broadcasters who owned them but didn't realize the value of the beachfront property they had? Soon someone's going to create a multicast smash hit with a highly targeted niche audience, creating edgy buzz about a station few people are cool enough to find. Boy, I wish I were a radio programmer who had a multicast channel or three to play on, along with the relative freedom that this early phase of multicasting would offer me.

(It's also amusing to me that, even though iBiquity insists that the letters in HD Radio do not stand for "high definition," many stations that adopt it insist on using the term in their marketing … including stations owned by CBS, which has deeper involvement in IBOC than any radio organization.)

Categories:
Location: Blogs Parent Separator Rwonline Blog
Dec 09


12/9/2008 2:18:16 PM 

It's interesting to see the developing nature of multicast programming, like the announcement yesterday that a radio upstart -- whippersnapper KDKA -- is airing the content of its AM outlet on the HD3 channels of three CBS Radio FMs in town. (KDKA itself went digital on its 50 kW signal at 1020 in May.)

One of the "subchannels" on each CBS FM in Pittsburgh (WBZW, WDSY and WZPT) now simulcasts KDKA. That's a lot of duplication, if you ask me; if multicast is about offering listeners "more choices," I'm not sure rebroadcasting the same content on four different radio channels in the market fulfills that goal. This is about choice of frequency, not choice of content. But give cluster managers credit for trying various ways of using their new infrastructure and for promoting their multicast offerings.

We're seeing more of this kind of thing as big broadcasters look at their existing pools of branded content, their new outlet channels and their desire to populate those channels affordably while making money off them or at least holding the space while the receiver market catches up.

But I still feel that multicasting is like the FM of the 1960s and that too many radio managers are overlooking the spectrum gold they're sitting on. How badly do you wish you could travel back in time and bamboozle an FM frequency from one of those broadcasters who owned them but didn't realize the value of the beachfront property they had? Soon someone's going to create a multicast smash hit with a highly targeted niche audience, creating edgy buzz about a station few people are cool enough to find. Boy, I wish I were a radio programmer who had a multicast channel or three to play on, along with the relative freedom that this early phase of multicasting would offer me.

(It's also amusing to me that, even though iBiquity insists that the letters in HD Radio do not stand for "high definition," many stations that adopt it insist on using the term in their marketing … including stations owned by CBS, which has deeper involvement in IBOC than any radio organization.)

Comments

Thank you for your comment. Please note that posts are reviewed for suitability and may not appear until the next business day.

Archive

December 2016 (2)
November 2016 (5)
October 2016 (7)
September 2016 (4)
August 2016 (6)
July 2016 (5)
June 2016 (3)
May 2016 (4)
April 2016 (3)
March 2016 (6)
February 2016 (4)
January 2016 (6)
December 2015 (7)
November 2015 (6)
October 2015 (11)
September 2015 (7)
August 2015 (8)
July 2015 (10)
June 2015 (14)
May 2015 (5)
April 2015 (6)
March 2015 (6)
February 2015 (4)
January 2015 (5)
December 2014 (7)
November 2014 (6)
October 2014 (10)
September 2014 (11)
August 2014 (14)
July 2014 (4)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (5)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (6)
February 2014 (7)
January 2014 (8)
December 2013 (9)
November 2013 (11)
October 2013 (9)
September 2013 (6)
August 2013 (5)
July 2013 (1)
June 2013 (4)
May 2013 (3)
April 2013 (2)
March 2013 (8)
February 2013 (8)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (3)
November 2012 (4)
October 2012 (7)
September 2012 (10)
August 2012 (4)
July 2012 (7)
June 2012 (4)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (10)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (5)
October 2011 (8)
September 2011 (9)
August 2011 (10)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (5)
May 2011 (7)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (9)
February 2011 (6)
January 2011 (7)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (6)
September 2010 (10)
August 2010 (8)
July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (5)
May 2010 (5)
April 2010 (11)
March 2010 (7)
February 2010 (5)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (2)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (5)
September 2009 (6)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (15)
May 2009 (8)
April 2009 (6)
March 2009 (2)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (1)
December 2008 (5)