homeIndexpage

Indoor Reception 'Impossible' to 'Non-Existent,' Say iBiquity and Greater Media

by Leslie Stimson, 07.13.2009




Greater Media and iBiquity conducted indoor elevated power reception tests using WKLB(FM), Waltham, Mass, as well. They took measurements at six locations with buildings chosen to represent different types of construction. This test is noteworthy because it used several buildings and multiple radios within the buildings, and because it involved a station whose signal covers an entire metro.

The first three locations in downtown Boston are within 8 to 10 miles of the WKLB transmission facility in Needham, Mass. They are the Greater Media studio building, a low-rise, two-story structure built with masonry, steel and glass; The Caning Shop, a single-story building of wood and masonry construction; and the Prudential Tower, a high-rise skyscraper of steel, aluminum and glass construction.

The other points where measurements were taken were farther out in the Boston Metro. They are a two-story, split-level home in Andover, of wood frame construction; the Comrex Corp. headquarters, a two-story steel framed, wood building in Devens; and a three-story apartment building of poured concrete (with rebar) construction in North Attleboro. These locations are at approximately the edge of digital coverage assuming the currently authorized –20 dB power level.



Up to four receivers, operated with manufacturer supplied antennas, were used simultaneously in each location to characterize reception at various points within each building. Generally, the closer testers were to the core of each building, the worse the digital reception was. Digital power was increased in 2 dB steps from –20 dB to –10 dB until the radio solidly locked onto the digital signal.

Testers concluded that in many types of buildings, digital reception is "simply impossible" on IBOC table radios and "nonexistent" on the new class of portable receivers about to be introduced into the market. An interim power level increase may partially mitigate the problem in some fixed locations, they concluded, however only the full 10 dB increase will permit reliable service to portable IBOC receivers and come close to replicating analog coverage.

As I noted, it's striking for advocates of HD Radio to state publicly that "digital reception is simply impossible in many types of buildings" and this says a lot about the HD Radio rollout. In pushing for an increase, the proponents are reiterating that they intentionally asked for a certain power level to be low enough so as not to cause analog interference to those stations nearby as well as those not yet digital. Engineers have said to me recently concerning the power issue that the NRSC, a largely volunteer effort, did what testing it could given the time and resources it had.


SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
 


COMMENTS (5)
diymedia - 07/20/2009
Unfortunately, we're kinda stuck with HD until the marketplace runs its course. Eureka 147 was originally backed by both b'ers and consumer electronics manufacturers, but was abandoned because (at the time) it only worked on spectrum which was reserved for military use. (It is no longer, and Eureka now works on multiple swaths of spectrum.) The FCC has already formally declared any other technology a non-starter, including DRM - which rolled out *after* the FCC took its stand.

Anonymous - 07/14/2009
Listeners will buy expensive receivers and put up elaborate antennas to pick up interference-laden signals carrying unique programming that they want to hear. IBOC is simply a money grab by a group of politically-connected industry insiders who, ironically, are largely the same ones responsible for the lackluster programming driving younger listeners to their iPods. Is there any question why it is failing? Fix the programming. The medium is not the problem.

Anonymous - 07/14/2009
Once they get all the horses on the line, in this HD race, and nobody is listening to it, because it's the same tune they have heard on the analog version of it. Improve the content, first, where you are. Don't be building a bridge to nowhere, where none tread or listen to.

Anonymous - 07/13/2009
In retrospect, I think DRM would have been a better choice as the bandwidth required is no wider than current FM standards. Indeed stereo is possible on shortwave with double sidebands of only 5KHz widths First require manufacturers to include DRM capability in all consumer FM receivers. Next license DRM transmissions on open channels giving listeners a choice. Then mandate a switchover similar to DTV.

Anonymous - 07/13/2009
In the end, it's going to take either "new" spectrum or a congressional mandate. Once the -10 signals go on, expect FM to loose listeners in droves, as they switch to alternate media - interference-free alternate media... I never did figure out the problem with Eureka 147 on L band channels... Of course, since the current crop of owners can't provide decent content anyway... feel free to draw the obvious conclusions.

More...     
Leave a Comment:
 
Text Only 2000 characters limit
Enter the word as it is shown in the box below: (Why?)
(case sensitive)