Broadcaster Pitches an Idea: A New Class for FM

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated the proposed maximum antenna height of C4 stations as 100 feet. The proposal calls for 100 meters (328 feet).
Is there room for a Class C4 of FM stations on the U.S. radio dial? Would such a new class help minority-owned stations in particular? What impact might a Class C4 have on low-power FM stations, which are expected to proliferate beyond current numbers?

Broadcast attorney Harry Cole points out these issues in a blog post about a proposal from SSR Communications Inc.

RW readers will recall that SSR and its CEO Matt Wesolowski have lobbied the FCC before, seeking to help short-spaced commercial FMs to upgrade facilities. SSR owns WYAB(FM), a Class A in Mississippi.

Now SSR has suggested that the FCC set up a new Class C4 in Zone II of the United States (which means most of the country minus notable areas in the northeast/central region and California). These stations would have ERP up to 12 kW and antenna height up to 100 meters.

As Cole puts it, SSR wants to “shoe-horn” this new class in between Classes A and C3, where there is more of a power gap than between other FM classes. Stations seeking to reclassify would be able to trigger orders to “show cause” directed to some “underfacilitied” stations on the same or adjacent channels, much as is the case now for the FCC’s Class C0 upgrade process.

Cole notes that SSR emphasizes not only the spectrum efficiency angle of this idea but also a benefit to minority-owned stations, possibly dozens if not hundreds of current Class As. Cole adds his opinion that historically, the commission “has been reluctant to modify its technical rules based on non-permanent factors such as the racial identity of the licensees of particular stations.” And he notes that the possible impact on LPFMs is unclear.

Read it here:
Explosive Proposal: C4 for FMs? (Harry Cole Blog)

Want to read more stories like this? Sign up for your free Radio World NewsBytes newsletter here.

Rating People: 3   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

John - the creation of a C4 allotment is not dependent on a 73.215 change, as the article suggests. The petition asks for a new class / C4 to fill in the power gap between A and C3, and it would affect many hundreds of class A stations eligible to take the extra power. The petition is only asking for Zone II changes, so zones I and IA, where the spectrum is more congested would be unaffected. MW
By Matt Wesolowski on 1/26/2013
Hello All, There is a minor error in the story, The petition asks for 100 meters HAAT, not 100 FEET. 100 meters equals 328 feet.
By Allen Sklar on 1/25/2013
This is a bad idea. This change in the FM rules would have a dramatic deleterious effect upon current FM translators carrying AM stations and HD2 signals with many of such translators being knocked off the air. Also, it would also likely have similar deleterious effects upon existing LPFMs. A little extra power for some FMs is not worth the elimination of many FM translators carrying AM stations.
By John Garziglia on 1/25/2013

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 800 characters

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!