HD Radio Goes Handheld

Portability in a very small package has finally arrived to the growing selection of HD Radio receivers. Amid a decent amount of pre-release advertising and promotion, the Insignia “Walkman-style” HD portable radio appeared nationwide in Best Buy stores in late July. I was lucky to snag one before all my local area stores sold out in a matter of weeks.

Antagonists of the controversial technology have always been quick to cite HD Radio’s inability to deliver receivers that perform well without lots of annoying dropouts. Or provide models that attract more than a yawn from consumers. The Insignia NS-HD01 is one HD Radio that should help put those criticisms to rest.


I personally called and visited several stores around my market to check and see if the Insignia pocket HD was in stock, and if the salespeople knew anything about it. Whenever I’ve done this in the past, I’ve usually been met with blank stares or suggestions I must be looking for satellite radios. Not this time.

Best Buy appears to have shipped only limited quantities of Insignias to most of their stores nationwide. But at least some stores have made an effort at educating sales staffs about the radio and why it’s different than other Walkmans and satellite portables. At the first store I visited, the Insignia radio hanger, with a nice promotion placard and $49.99 price tag, was empty. The sales clerk checked stock and told me they had just sold the last one.

I engaged the 20-ish clerk to find out if she knew what HD Radio was and, to my pleasant surprise, she actually knew about the “secret stations between the stations.” She also knew about the Insignia component HD tuner, also being sold at Best Buy for $105. She offered to call a few nearby stores and found only two portables left, so I had them hold one I could pick up on the way home. Since then, many stores have already sold out of their second restocking. Your own Best Buy experiences may vary.


Anybody who has used HD Radio products knows what the shortcomings have been. Car radios generally perform well on the open road with the advantage of external antennas. Indoor desktop radios and tuners often need external antennas, especially in blocked and compromised venues. Supplemental channels suffer dropouts with no blend to analog. These problems are more pronounced in Class B and terrain-challenged areas of the country. We haven’t had a pocket HD Radio receiver with its earbud headphone wire antenna until now.

The usual method I’ve used to evaluate any kind of new model radio has been to see how well it holds up in various well-known reception areas of high multipath and HD dropouts. My own house is in one of those “black holes” where it’s very hard to get clean analog reception, let alone HD. Most desktops, especially early HD models, won’t hold most of the local market HD stations without a lot of futzing with their attached wire antennas. Using an outside antenna has been my only solution to get clean analog FM and consistent HD reception.

Walking around my house and yard, the Insignia portable performs surprisingly well. Yes, there are dropouts, but far fewer than I was expecting. What’s especially impressive is the initial blend from analog to HD lock. The analog signals are often noticeably contaminated with multipath noise, which totally disappears in HD.

Driving around and listening with the Insignia portable laying on the front seat and one earbud connected also yielded rather impressive results. Comparing the quality of simultaneous reception of the same stations with my after-market JVC HD car radio in the dash, I was quite surprised to find both radios performed very much the same. The brief dropouts encountered seemed to occur in the same locales. Overall, HD reception held up very well, even in areas blocked by hills and the densely packed tall downtown buildings.

Before installing HD in the car about four years ago, I was forced to put up with a lot of noisy multipath and stoplight fades during my daily commute. Since then, I’ve gotten so used to clean and dependable HD reception, I don’t even care to listen to analog any more. HD is simply that much better.


Selling HD Radio as a worthy successor to analog has been hampered by the widely varying perceptions of how well it performs across different markets. Every market, and the stations that serve it, has unique terrain features, different FCC-imposed transmitter power limits and different transmitter sites, with varying height and proximity to the population centers. These all affect the overall quality of reception.

There certainly are some markets more challenged than others where overall HD performance is poor in the suburban and fringe areas farther away from the primary FM transmitter sites. Most of the pro reviews I’ve read on HD Radios give their performance very little positive spiff. Many of those you find in trade journals and the Internet are written by folks living in New York City, Chicago, San Francisco and Los Angeles. Those are all Class B markets where most FMs operate with over-height antennas on tall towers or downtown skyscrapers. Except for the California super-power grandfathers, these stations run with reduced ERP. HD powers at 1 percent of analog run less than 70 watts in these markets. No wonder so many complain about frequent blending and HD2/HD3 dropouts.

A lot of these consumer reporters and reviewers need to get out a little more and discover how well HD Radio works in other areas. Out in Class C country, it’s often a different experience. But just don’t take my word for it. A decent sampling of consumer reviews of the Insignia portable as of this writing confirms that 34 out of 45 buying customers from all over the country give it high marks. Check them out at: tinyurl.com/y9eap5g

A few of the reviewers are disappointed the Insignia portable doesn’t include the AM band, an MP3 player or iTunes tagging. Others don’t like the rechargeable 10-hour battery life and non-replaceable battery. Some say there aren’t enough presets or the earbuds are uncomfortable. But for a breakthrough product of this size and impressive performance for under $50, I say it’s a slam-dunk winner. I have yet to find a radio fan interested in HD who doesn’t want it. Most have either bought one or are still trying to find stock at Best Buy. It’ll make a splendid Christmas present.


The single most daunting problem still dogging FM HD is the lack of reception stability. Any consumer who buys an HD radio and has trouble getting their favorite HD stations to stay locked will be disappointed and probably return it for a refund. We’ve known for a long time that more digital power is really the only viable solution.

The push for up to –10 dBc power increase has shifted into high gear. More stations that can increase HD power have requested and received STAs or experimental temporary licenses. I’ve had a chance to check in on a few; without exception, every engineer involved in the testing agrees that even a 3 dB increase is noticeable. A 6 dB boost provides very significant improvement and 10 dB is dramatic. Except for a few isolated first-adjacent interference complaints, most notably WRNI vs. WKLB in the Boston area, these increases have proven to be compatible with the existing analog service.


NPR Labs has done the most theoretical evaluation work characterizing the interference impact that an HD power increase would inflict over the entire FM band. With the help of the folks at FCCINFO.com, their quick calculator was devised as a measuring stick for determining what level of HD increase could be employed by any station without causing interference to their first adjacent neighbors. Check it out for your station at www.nprlabs.org/publications/distribution/interimIBOCpowerallowance/index.php.

The calculator projects the amount of OFDM sideband power (albeit very small) that occurs inside the first-adjacent channels of an HD station with a – 20 dBc injection, using this value as the limit allowed for an interfering contour for first-adjacent analog protection under the present rules. The amount of allowable HD power increase varies all the way from zero to the full 10 dBc, depending on the first-adjacent allocations situation for each station. It’s not too surprising the calculator yields rather conservative estimates for theoretically allowed increases. A number of Clear Channel, Greater Media and CBS stations that are running higher HD powers under STAs have demonstrated that the NPR calculator limits have been too restrictive when power increases are actually deployed and evaluated. My old friend and colleague, Clear Channel engineering exec Jeff Littlejohn, has recently gone on record confirming that conclusion, and is pressing harder for FCC adoption of HD power increases up to –10 dBc.

NPR Labs has also recently performed a number of field studies of existing stations and their first-adjacent neighbors involving experimental HD power increases. A summary report of the results and findings should be published this month. NPR Labs invited various “watchdog” observers from several commercial broadcast groups to participate in these tests and provide input.

The easiest way for the commission to correctly consider the HD power increase proposal and properly write it into law is to focus on the results of actual field tests. Temporary power increases for such testing should be encouraged and quickly granted when requested so that more stations can collect and report more field data. Theoretical expectations lose their importance when they can be replaced by real world measurements. Let’s just hope this process doesn’t take too long.

Guy Wire is the pseudonym for a veteran radio broadcast engineer.

Rating People: 3   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

I really would like to know how this companies design their products, is there any end-user feedback in the design? It is pretty stupid if they stopped using end-users before shipping final product. Look at the Ipod they finally enabled FM radio after how many generations? WHY did they not have the Digital Radio also. because jobs is a moron.
By TiredofStupidDesigns on 10/14/2009
There is something wrong with the posting system on this web page. My comments have been mangled.
By T.L. on 10/17/2009
I was just given the Insignia NS-HD01 as a gift from a friend. It is a very good to excellent FM receiver on analog and digital. In fact I CANNOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN HD OR DIGITAL SIGNAL AND A TRADITIONAL ANALOG STEREO BROAD on this radio. This raises the question: Is digital radio really an auditory improvement over analog? Also, the reception does have arbitrary outs on HD 2 and HD 3 stations. Although these are not that common, they can be quite annoying when they happen. I would like to see real proofs that the digital side band increase the HD lobby wants will not be the reception disrupter it has proven to be on the AM band.
By T.L. on 10/17/2009
anonymous did it ever occur to you that RDS doesn't work well? I'm sorry but having had a hd radio in the car a number of years and just used this unit it isn't a bad format. Let's say a listener wants to buy the music played in question...with HD you know what the track is...with analog you have to wait or go online to a website to look up as to what was played. NPR labs already has evidence that FM would not be a disrupter on the AM band. Actually the AM band isn't being disrupted because those same arguments can be used as nightwave causes clear channels to come in at night. Hense no one in boston complains that WTOP (1500) comes in clear as a bell as would WOR, WFAN, WABC etc. All of these easily jam signals in other markets given the power levels. There's nothing wrong with analog...however why let it rot...it's 2009. How do you attract more listeners in this era? With any HDTV it has in it guides that are free that tell information. Analog radio doesn't tell you much at all (RDS tried to help but it's not that good)
By nedm on 11/3/2009
Struble, like Microsoft, short-supplied the Best Buy Stores. Struble admits that Insignia sales have been a flop: "Insignia HD — I think this will be a nice little interim step for jogging or working out. It proves the viability [of the technology] and hopefully we'll get sales; but no, this is not going to sell in the hundreds of thousands... Radio alone — the sad reality of where it is — as a standalone device, it just doesn't exist anymore as a category. Nobody goes into Best Buy and says 'Where's the radio department?'" http://www.rwonline.com/article/87370 Too bad, Guy, you POS - LOL!
By HD Radio Farce on 10/13/2009
Avid radio listner. What does having an EE have to do with anything? I'm an EE and find nothing wrong the current analog system as do most other people who listen to radio. HD radio doesn't sell except to a few people like you who seem to be infatuated with anything digital. I suggest you get over it.
By Bob Ervin on 10/17/2009
I concur with what Guy Wire is saying. I work with many EEs in my company that have purchased HD radios in their car and everyone of them has positive things to say about it except that the coverage is not as good as the analog. Every friend and family member who has travelled with me in my car is equally impressed. I have listened to a close spaced 1st adjacent station in an area where a proponent station broading at -10dBc IBOC under FCC STA would supposedly cause excessive interference. Let me clear up the misinformation (put out by elitist radiophiles) for once and for all - the interference was very tolerable. Digital white noise interference is much more tolerable than analog interference. The NPR predictions of loss of listnership are far far too conservative. HD radio should be looked at from another perspective and that is as a solution to interference and FM stereo reception problems. I have had it for 4 years and could not be more satisfied with the except for the low IBOC power level. Without the power increase HD radio only provides enhancement in areas where the analog signal is already pretty strong. In many cities the highest population growth areas are in the outer suburbs where mobile FM stereo reception is unsatisfactory over large areas and HD radio at -10dBc would provide a night and day improvement. Thanks Guy for being frank and reflecting what the majority of us believe.
By Avid radio listner on 10/15/2009
Hey Avid radio listner - 10/15/2009. Let me clear up the misinformation (put out by people like you) once and for all. Did it ever occur to you that most people who listen to radio are completely satisfied with analog mode and only have issues with content not transmission mode. You're the elitist radiophile.
By Anonymous on 10/17/2009
The guy at the top of the page looks like Bob Struble dressed up in a cowboy suit. How fitting
By Anonymous on 10/14/2009
"Guy Wire is the pseudonym for a veteran radio broad engineer." Good thing too. This fool shouldn't disclose his real name because then everyone would know who the idiot is.
By Anonymous on 10/14/2009
Including HD Radio, instead of an analog FM-tuner would have cost Jobs iBiquity's licensing and chipset fees, to include an inferior product. The inclusion of an FM-Tuner in the new Nano has not made the device more popular: http://radio-info.com/newsletter/html/ror-10132009.html The inclusion of FM-tuners will make little difference.
By Anonymous on 10/14/2009

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 800 characters

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!