Law Firm's HD Radio Probe Still in Early Days
     
print  rss 


Keefe Bartels, the law firm that's looking into whether consumers are unhappy with their new HD Radio car receivers, is hearing lots of stories. Whether legal action will result remains unclear.

We reported on the New Jersey firm's efforts last week. John Keefe, a managing partner, tells me the firm is still in the information-gathering stage and has not filed a lawsuit on behalf of unhappy consumers — though what it finds could potentially lead to that from the personal injury firm.

Keefe became interested in the technology when he bought a new BMW a couple of years ago. He says the dealer told him HD Radio wouldn't work but that it was built into the cost of the car, because the receiver was part of a package. He says the dealer threw in a set of floor mats to compensate.

Keefe told me he heard the AM signal blending between digital and analog and back again in a demo. He called it "bumping," which sounded like upcutting speech, as that happened.

The firm is soliciting comments from unhappy consumers regarding HD Radio on its website. Keefe says it is receiving complaints from "all kinds of people" and wants to determine how individuals have been affected. He didn't say how many exactly or go into details.

Keefe, who describes himself as a consumer advocate lawyer, says he wants to understand if potentially faulty car HD Radio receivers have cost consumers money — from paying more for the car because of the package and then either not being able to receive a reliable digital signal or because there are not a lot of digital signals in their area.

When I contacted iBiquity for my first story on this, they had no comment.

It sounds like most of the complaints he's getting are from AM listeners. He's also getting an earful from radio industry people, so this should be interesting. I'll keep you up to date.

print  rss 

Rating People: 0   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

No, RW is not downplaying anything. We're reporting here what the attorney said. If your paranoia about Radio World trying to block anything negative about HD were valid, you wouldn't be reading this story here; and we wouldn't be posting your comments. Any reasoned overview of HD-related commentaries and stories on our site will turn up plenty of fair-handed treatment, including published criticism of the format, both FM and AM IBOC.
By Paul McLane on 9/9/2010
@Anonymous - Thanks for replying. I'm not arguing that there isn't FM interference or concerns, nor am I making the predictions you attribute to me about where this legal effort might end up. I took exception to the statement that when quoting an attorney about AM complaints, RW was somehow intentionally downplaying FM problems, and to the idea that we would seek to quash such sentiments in our coverage. We don't. In fact I go out of my way to make sure all industry voices have the chance to speak up on these topics, even when those voices lump us in with the partisans. I take very seriously our responsibility to publish and acknowledge dissenting views and to report what news sources say or do, whether I agree with those voices or not. In this case, the reporter wrote what the news source told her, nothing more.
By Paul McLane on 9/9/2010
It's good to see a legal challenge finally starting to develop. The monopolistic and downright sneaky nature as well as the questionable statistics presented by the proponents is something that has been very bad for the industry and at times I believe RW has contributed to that. Hopefully it will stop now.
By Jeff Duglose on 9/9/2010
To the anonymous human of September 12: Title 47 covers a lot of regulation. Do you have a part and section in mind? Please tell.
By James Johnson on 9/17/2010
This is more a complaint about how the car makers are not handling car radio installations right. I wish I could get thirty dollars of the fifty dollars that I spent on an Insignia brand "HD" radio back.
By James Johnson on 9/11/2010

Post your comment

Your Name: Required
Your Mail:    Email is used only to display Gravatar
Your Site:   
Comment Info:         

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!