LPFM, FM Translators, on FCC’s Tentative Agenda
     

Barring the items falling off the agenda for one reason or another, at its Nov. 30 meeting the commission intends to take another crack at balancing the needs of new low-power FM owners versus stations that have pending FM translator applications.

The agency intends to expand LPFM ownership opportunities by implementing the Local Community Radio Act and also expects to vote on final procedures to approve the more than 6,000 FM translator applications that have been pending since 2003.

WHO'S SAYING WHAT ABOUT LPFM & TRANSLATORS
 
 
 
 
Prometheus Lobbies FCC on LPFM
 

At issue with the translator applications is a proposed nationwide cap of 50 apps and local cap of one-to-a-market per ownership group in the top 150 radio markets. Several broadcasters have challenged the caps as arbitrary. The Educational Media Foundation, which self-winnowed its pending translator applications from 500 to 300, opposes the caps, saying the threat of translator application speculation has been overstated.

Instead of caps on applications, EMF suggests limits could be placed on granted applications — or, to exempt small and unrated markets from the caps.

LPFM advocates have been pushing the FCC to approve second-adjacent channel spacing waivers more regularly, something NAB and NPR believe should only happen in very limited cases.

In recent lobbying trips to the Portals, Prometheus Radio Group has also pushed for higher-power LPFM stations, something the Amherst Alliance also supports, as well as program origination requirements.

Both the LPFM and the translator issues are on the agency’s tentative agenda for the Nov. 30 meeting; however the issues could be voted on earlier or, if no consensus is reached before the meeting, postponed.

 


Rating People: 0   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

FM Translators were designed to be used as fill for fm stations programming in dead areas of their main contour area. It has since turned into a way to create a new radio station with different programming, thus creating additional market competition, via an embedded HD2 signal in another station transmitter owned by the same group. Do you really think this is a fair practice?
By Gary Belzman on 11/21/2012

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 800 characters


Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!