NPR Should Look Beyond the Beltway
     
print  rss 


Even before the Juan Williams fiasco there were those of us in public radio circles who saw a hobbled system that has never recovered from funding termination threats posed by President Reagan’s budget director, David Stockman.

Since 1981, we have seen far too many public radio managers, acting out of this insecurity, hung up on the conformity of an audience-building mindset (following consultants and self-appointed experts, best typified by the moniker “guys in suits with charts”), at the expense of possessing a spirit of spontaneity, innovation and true passion for what should be a unique form of radio.

Pete Simon says public radio needs to draw upon — and assure the survival of — small-market, low-budgeted urban public stations.
There is a place where this spirit can be rekindled, but it is far from large-market pressures and suffocating conformity.

For 30 years, the system has been in a slow glide. A mindset of complacency was illustrated recently when NPR and CPB both declined to get involved in any serious effort to lobby the FCC to expand the noncommercial/educational FM band to (at least) 87.7 MHz.

NPR and CPB apparently are happy with the status quo, in which all they can think of are new HD channels on existing public stations that they think will fill programming voids. Nice theory — if those HD channels are controlled by public entities other than ones controlling the main signals, entities not steeped in play-it-safe approaches to programming. Fat chance!

I’m reminded of the bankruptcy of this mindset whenever I hear the highly-compressed commercial sports talk (“The Ticket”) signal at 87.7 in Denver, bleeding over into the signal of Denver’s classical music station at 88.1 FM operated by Colorado Public Radio.

Through inaction, the slow-mo approach of NPR and CPB has killed chances to expand the NCE portion of the FM band. They just stick with what is safe on the programming side of things.

While on business travel over the past two years, I listened to large-market public stations in New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore/Washington, Norfolk and Richmond. In every locale, there was a sameness to the presentation of news and music.

In Philadelphia, WRTI, a station I listened to loyally 30 to 40 years ago before moving to Colorado, sounded alien to me even though it continues to play jazz. The station has gone through a massive “upgrade.” Gone are passionate and knowledgeable jazz announcers, replaced by uninspired people who sound as if they are reading from cue cards.

The best jazz station I’ve heard in this part of the country, in terms of content and presentation, is WESM(FM) at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. Its remote locale has insulated them from major-market pressures and over-analysis that have crippled WRTI and many other “big-city” stations.

Break the mold

One solution: Draw upon and assure the survival of small-market and low-budgeted urban public stations.

Currently the KGNUs, WWOZs and small community stations have little or no money for adequate promotion of programming, training and developmental funding for producing unique radio programming.

Conservative larger-market stations have had their chance to do this; with a few exceptions (such as WNYC’s “The Take Away” and WHYY’s new community news reporting initiative) the big boys have not contributed anything new or innovative for listeners down the street or across the country. “Conventional wisdom” within the public radio community runs contrary to this observation.

Some large-market stations, still in an expansionist mode, see the pittance that small stations receive from CPB and simply are waiting for smaller ones nearby to fold so they can “gladly” enter into “partnerships” with them.

If played out, this scenario will be the death knell of a system screaming for ideas and a viable platform to develop programs, announcers, reporters and producers.

Obviously, a lot of struggling small-market stations are lucky to broadcast every day. Then there are hamlets in remote places that only need the right nurturing and money to make a national impact.

Talent pool

One such place is KVNF(FM), Paonia, Colo., a town with just 3,000 people nestled up against the West Elk Mountains and Wilderness Area.

Paonia’s population is made up of miners, old hippies, writers, artists and talented, insightful reporters who work at one of this country’s best environmental newspapers, High Country News. With an NPR station of more than 30 years in town, the possibilities for this potential talent pool of all ages are endless, given serious funding, for the development of radio programs and new voices with untried/unheard-of concepts for public radio.

As CPB goes through the congressional microscope again, it would be wise to evaluate where its limited funds for qualified stations are spent. Do they want to continue funding all stations (in part) by matching how much non-federal money each station raises each year? This formula works best for major-market stations, where the potential for community underwriting and potential listener support is high. Compare that to a place like Paonia and the 160,000 people that KVNF reaches across seven rural/frontier counties in western Colorado.

As it jumps through hoops with the new Congress over various issues, including the firing of commentator Williams, NPR would be wise to add to its roster of commentators someone from a town like Paonia, where it could start by seeking out one of the writers at High Country News.

I’m talking about people who are on par intellectually with major-market “experts.” In the Internet age of the 21st century, people speaking from such places should no longer be thought of by people at NPR as charming yet nothing more than “country bumpkins.” Is NPR ready to walk-their-talk about exploring ideas, diversity, etc.?

Let’s change things up a bit to help our National Public Radio networks expand the horizons of listeners, with fresh ideas and concepts developed away from the Potomac. A good place to start: NPR should broadcast one of its regular news programs for a week from KVNF. That would turn some heads — even those of NPR critics — inside and outside the Beltway.

The author has worked in public and community radio since 1974. He is an announcer on KUVO(FM) in Denver.

print  rss 

Rating People: 5   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

The problem, like so much else in the US today, is that beltway. The ideas that will stimulate public radio, along with government and so many other institutions simply do not exist there. Too many people (and I use the term loosely) are too impressed with themselves and the fact that they are in DC being important to do any original thinking or move to see anything in the rest of the US. NPR needs to remind itself the it's middle name is "PUBLIC!"
By Jon Rogers on 1/5/2011
Apologies in advance to my fellow RF comm types working for NPR, but...Amen to Anony Mouse. I find no constitutional mandate for the federal government supporting any particular radio programming source. In addition, when an agency that arguably has a constitutional reason to exist (NASA, exploration of our national frontiers like Lewis and Clark) is perennially on the chopping block, along with bits of the USAF ('provide for the common defense"), my tolerance for supporting NPR funding s below the "give a darn" line. If I found programming on NPR I liked, I would listen, but I do not. Maybe that's the most damning indictment of NPR.
By Crusty Old TV Tech on 1/6/2011
I understand your frustration and agree that public tax funding of NPR results in a suffocating status quo conformity control. But as long as public broadcasting stays on the teet of public tax-dollar-funding they will suffer this control by arrogant central planners. The tax dollar funding needs to be ended, not relocated. NPR more appropriately stands for National Progressive Radio. Regardless of the slant, the people's tax dollars should not be used to support broadcasting of a particular political religion, left or right. So why is this sacred leftist cow protected? Put it out in the field with the rest of the mastitic radio cows about to be sent to the techno-obsolescent slaughter house. -Anony Mouse
By Anonymous on 1/5/2011
There is a community radio station here in Tampa (wmnf.org) that seems to separate itself from the normal NPR broadcast. It is funded by its listeners and shares some NPR content. My opinion is that the objectivity, content and value of the news broadcasts surpass corporate media 20:1. Without plugging their cause with all the supporting reasons, it could be stated that all the above comments omit the alternative. Reality is that commercial broadcasters are limited to reporting (or spinning) all news stories towards the perspective as viewed through the eyes of Geico, BP, Pfizer or Progressive. It is painfully obvious how contorted and convoluted news reports are on commercial broadcasting networks; each favoring one political or economic position. I suggest all nay-sayer's watch a documentary entitled '3 shots that changed America'. Note how sincere, honest and amateur the news reporters and stories were during the early 60's, compared to the content seen today. I'll agree that if some of the content was improved to attract more listeners, the funding could require less gov't hand-outs. But our country relies on opposite poles to attract the majority towards the middle or centrist viewpoint. NPR's role in society is just as important to our cultural stability as the O'Reily Factor.
By Anonymous on 1/12/2011
The NPR 'franchise' has locked in hundreds of affiliates that simply relay 'the NPR satellite' most of the day and are content with that. One that I know of is automated a good part of the day and night, with morning 'local news' breaks, but everything else from NPR, switched by computer at the station. After sundown, the station operates unattended, broadcasting BBC or shows recorded earlier in the dayall on automation. This stations 'local brand' is very strong, so it rakes in hundreds of thousands each pledge drive, but does very very little community programming. There is a lesser public radio station that offers a 'mix' of music and other programs, not the NPR standard fare and guess what? They cannot raise nearly the money with their programming as the mainstream NPR station does. This is the dilemma of public radio-listeners SAY they want something different, but they don't pledge for it! Listeners actually pay for the McDonald's program stream, the same all over the country of NPR/PRI programming fare. Another local station, public radio, tried for years with a mix of programming, eclectic, etc., and listeners said they wanted this but at pledge time, the phones barely rang. So, this station switched to a specific kind of music 24/7, and pledging skyrocketed. The public radio listener will not pay for variety locally produced.
By Anonymous on 1/14/2011

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 400 characters

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!