RF Exposure Policies Under Review
     

The FCC is reviewing its RF exposure policies.

The agency wants to update its policies and make sure they comply with the National Environmental Policy Act requirements for environmental reviews, especially those related to health and safety of RF emissions from radio transmitters.

The commission rolled out a Report and Order and a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in ET Docket 13-84, and a Notice of Inquiry in a new docket, 03-137. In the order the commission concludes several technical and semantic issues initiated in 2003 that revise and update its regulations implementing NEPA. In the Further Notice the agency proposes to further update and revise its procedures and treat all services equally. And in the inquiry the FCC seeks public input to determine whether its RF exposure limits and policies need to be reassessed.

The commission proposes to revise and harmonize the criteria for determining whether single or multiple fixed, mobile, or portable RF sources should be routinely evaluated for compliance with the RF exposure limits or exempted from such evaluations.

The inquiry focuses on the propriety of existing standards and policies, possible options for precautionary exposure reduction and possible improvements to the FCC’s equipment authorization process and policies as they relate to RF exposure.

Comments are due 90 days after Federal Register publication.

 


Rating People: 2   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

Amazing how they find the time, personnel and resources for this when the sequester has supposedly constrained other activities at the FCC and other agencies.
By Cris Alexander on 4/2/2013
One thought -- Requiring annual testing at the uncontrolled border would be a colossal waste of money, but a full-employment for consulting engineers regulation. If there is no change in output, there is no need for testing, especially in rural environments, such as mountain tops.
By Fred Hopengarten, Esq. on 4/1/2013
Yes, the RF exposure limits and policies need to be reassessed. It would be a travesty for public health in the U.S. if FCC re-affirms the current regulatory standard for cell phone radiation or weakens it to the international (ICNIRP) standard. Defining the outer ear as an "extremity" is absurd. Please do not cave in to the telecommunication industry. Do your job to protect PEOPLE!
By Marnie H Singer on 4/1/2013

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 800 characters


Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!