Second-Adjacent Channel Spacing Waivers Still to Be Decided
     

The FCC made so many decisions regarding the future of pending FM translator applications and future low-power FMs it had to break up its determinations into two documents.

The second document, a Fifth Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Fourth Order on Reconsideration, was also released last night. In the fifth R&O, the agency eliminated third-adjacent channel protections for full-service FMs in order to fit more LPFMs on the dial. Congress mandated that change when it passed the Local Radio Community Act. Spacing requirements remain to protect Radio Reading Services.

In the further notice, the FCC asked for comment on how to implement other provisions of LCRA, such as whether and under what conditions it should allow waivers of second-adjacent channel spacing requirements for full-service stations to allow more LPFMs in a market. It also asked for comments on complaint procedures for cases of third-adjacent channel interference to full-service FMs and interference to FM translator inputs.

The agency also asked for public input on recommended rule changes to help LPFMs become more sustainable while also preserving the technical integrity of all FM services, including the elimination of the LP10s and a power increase for LPFMs in certain areas. It also proposed allowing an entity to own both an LPFM and an FM translator.

Comments are due to MM Docket 99-25 30 days after Federal Register publication.

Related:
LPFM vs. FM Translator Sorting Begins

LPFM Proponents Hail FCC’s ‘Transformative’ Decision


Rating People: 6   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

Here's the timeline: 3 months, FCC approves 2nd adjacent channel allocations for LPFM. 9 months, filing window opens. 2 years, logjam starts to clear with approval of some CP's. 3 years, with those LPFM's being built, full power stations which are 2nd adjacent, employ iboc at -10. 3 years + 1 day, LPFM's begin carping about interference. 3 years and six months, congress reconsiders "secondary" status of LPFM's. Unfortunately, congress is only adept at playing checkers. No way can they think more than one move ahead.
By Chicago860 on 3/26/2012

Post your comment

Your Name:  Required
Your Mail:       Your email will not be published.
Your Site:    

max. 800 characters


Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!