Print  RSS 
Jun 16

Paul McLane
6/16/2011 6:57:00 PM 

<p>&#160;</p> <div><i><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><br /> </span></i><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Among the studies submitted to the FCC and</span> </span><a href="http://radioworld.com/article/fcc-releases-five-media-ownership-studies/23730"><span style="font-size: small;">released this week</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">as part of its media ownership review process is one that looks at the relationship between radio station ownership and minority-targeted programming, always a hot-button political topic in radio circles.</span></span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Its findings seem unlikely to create major change in the political calculus or in industry opinion about the key issues. But decide for yourself. Here are its conclusions. The study was by</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Joel Waldfogel </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">of the Carlson School and Department of Economics at the University of Minnesota:</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">1) As in the 1990s, blacks and nonblacks — and Hispanics and non-Hispanics — have “starkly different preferences” in radio programming, </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Waldfogel found</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">. “Urban stations collectively attract half of black listening but only 4% of nonblack listening. Spanish stations attract nearly half of Hispanic listening and negligible amounts of non-Hispanic listening.”</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">2) Some minority-targeted formats like urban, jazz and Spanish are less commonly available than others. </span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">3) “As in the 1990s, most minority-owned stations target minority listeners, but — also as in the 1990s — most minority-targeted stations are not minority-owned.”</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">4) </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Waldfogel found that s</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">tations in large groups tend to attract more listeners — overall, as well as among blacks and Hispanics — than do stations in smaller ownership groups. </span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">5) The availability of minority-targeted stations seems to attract more minorities to radio listening, he wrote, though with qualifications.</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">6) The presence of minority-owned stations in a market appears to raise the amount of minority-targeted programming. </span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div><span style="font-size: 10pt;">7) In the period </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Waldfogel </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">studied (2005–2009), he found “mixed evidence” on the statistical relationship between ownership concentration and content variety. He said he was “unable to draw strong conclusions” using data from this time frame, but he cautioned that this is “not the same as a robust finding that there is no effect.” He said existing studies found that elevated ownership concentration raised the number of varieties available, “especially conditional” on the number of stations.</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The report makes for dry reading but it provides insight into the challenges (and processes) in trying to quantify things that don’t easily lend themselves to being quantified.</span></div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;">&#160;</div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The charts and data toward the end are intriguing, looking at factors such as “Minority and Group Radio Station Ownership,” “Black and White Listening Patterns” by format and “Metro Area Station Availability” (in which we learn for instance that in 2009, 95% of 300 Arbitron metros had at least one country station, 48% had an urban station and 6% had an easy listening/beautiful music outlet).</span></div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;">&#160;</div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">The studies can be found on its </span><a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/"><span style="font-size: small;">website</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> under “Ownership Studies.”</span></div> <div>&#160;</div> <div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">These reports by scholars outside the agency are meant to help the commission in its periodic media ownership review (MB Docket No. 09-182). Overall, the studies look at issues that affect diversity, competition and localism. Comments are due July 12.</span></div>

Comments

Thank you for your comment. Please note that posts are reviewed for suitability and may not appear until the next business day.

Archive

July 2016 (3)
June 2016 (3)
May 2016 (4)
April 2016 (3)
March 2016 (6)
February 2016 (4)
January 2016 (6)
December 2015 (7)
November 2015 (6)
October 2015 (11)
September 2015 (7)
August 2015 (8)
July 2015 (10)
June 2015 (14)
May 2015 (5)
April 2015 (6)
March 2015 (6)
February 2015 (4)
January 2015 (5)
December 2014 (7)
November 2014 (6)
October 2014 (10)
September 2014 (11)
August 2014 (14)
July 2014 (4)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (5)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (6)
February 2014 (7)
January 2014 (8)
December 2013 (9)
November 2013 (11)
October 2013 (9)
September 2013 (6)
August 2013 (5)
July 2013 (1)
June 2013 (4)
May 2013 (3)
April 2013 (2)
March 2013 (8)
February 2013 (8)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (3)
November 2012 (4)
October 2012 (7)
September 2012 (10)
August 2012 (4)
July 2012 (7)
June 2012 (4)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (10)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (5)
October 2011 (8)
September 2011 (9)
August 2011 (10)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (5)
May 2011 (7)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (9)
February 2011 (6)
January 2011 (7)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (6)
September 2010 (10)
August 2010 (8)
July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (5)
May 2010 (5)
April 2010 (11)
March 2010 (7)
February 2010 (5)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (2)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (5)
September 2009 (6)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (15)
May 2009 (8)
April 2009 (6)
March 2009 (2)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (1)
December 2008 (5)