6/20/2012 2:43 PM
McLane is editor in chief of the U.S. edition of Radio World.
You did order your CAP-compliant EAS gear with plenty of lead time
to meet the looming deadline, didn’t you?
Quite a few U.S.
radio stations did not, perhaps because they were gambling on another delay of
that deadline, or because they were confused by the process, or because they
assumed equipment manufacturers and dealers could crank out product on demand.
Well June 30 is approaching with no sign of any intention by the
FCC of a further extension. Indeed just nine days ago the Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau issued a terse press release reminding EAS participants
that they must be able to receive and process Common Alerting
Protocol-formatted alerts by the end of next week.
stations will not be able to comply because their gear won’t have arrived. I’m
hearing from dealers that new CAP-compliant hardware ordered now will arrive in
July, August or even early September.
“Looks like more
stations chose to wait until the last minute than any of us anticipated,” said
Tim Schwieger, president/CEO of dealer BSW. His company has hundreds of units
on backorder, the longest being 60 days. Manufacturers, he said, “have been
slammed with a higher sales volume than anticipated at this late stage.”
Equipment dealer SCMS has about 150 backorders. “We were able
to fill orders from stock until two weeks ago, so the oldest one is about 14
days and will be a total of 40 days by mid-July,” said owner Bob Cauthen.
Harold Price, president of equipment maker Sage Alerting
Systems, said customers who ordered gear from Sage dealers as recently as May
should get their gear by the deadline. New orders, though, will come in July or
Ed Czarnecki, senior director for strategy,
development & regulatory affairs for manufacturer Monroe Electronics/Digital Alerting
Systems, said equipment delivery is “a few weeks” after order. “The closer to
the deadline the order is placed, the longer it may take to deliver due to a
last-minute surge of orders.” (I’m talking throughout this story about stations that choose to go with full-blown new EAS gear, not converters, which is its own interesting and somewhat controversial topic, as we’ve reported.)
Should equipment companies
have better anticipated this round of demand? It’s hard to blame them. Buyers had more than a year of notice. Manufacturers
ramped up and produced thousands of units last year, and many broadcasters took
advantage. Further, no one seems to know the precise number of EAS units that
the market will consume in total (in part because some hardware serves multiple
stations). Manufacturers must hire staff, outsource labor and buy parts based
on projections; dealers must try to anticipate “once-a-decade” stocking needs.
These are not big corporations, they’re relatively small companies. That puts
them in a tough spot.
In defense of manufacturers,
Schwieger said, “It was impossible to identify the exact number of stations
that had CAP-compliant equipment installed or on order. We became a bit
tentative in the last 60 days in ordering a massive amount of units out of fear
of not being able to sell them should the market reach saturation.”
Regardless, said Price of Sage, “We and our distributor
community are trying to fill these orders as fast as we can. We had way more
than we’d expected [in recent weeks] but we’re working to get those shipped out
as soon as we can.” Czarnecki sounded a similar theme: “Digital Alert Systems
has the component inventory in stock, and we’re moving as quickly as we can to
A lot of people, including me,
assume that enforcement folks at the commission are unlikely to start writing tickets
for CAP noncompliance on July 1. Conceivably, this could be a costly
assumption. Nor is there any way to tell when a presumed grace period expires.
It would help things a great deal at this juncture if FCC
staff would spell out the proper course of action for a station that has gear on order yet can’t get it until
after the deadline. Price noted that FCC officials have encouraged such
stations to “get in touch” with them but hadn’t specified how. This
suggests a station can’t rest easy just because it has a copy of a purchase
order in hand. Should the station notify the FCC through a particular mechanism?
A phone call? A request for waiver? Smoke signals? Lacking such guidance, your
best bet is to consult your station legal counsel.
many other stations are working through more immediate questions.
“We are handling a very substantial level of calls asking
about the IPAWS system, and how broadcasters should handle their own internal
networks and firewalls,” Czarnecki said. “Easily, 80% of our calls at the
moment have more to do with IPAWS, Internet service or firewall configuration”
rather than anything directly to do with backordered gear.
2 comment(s) so far...
By Barely Legal on
6/22/2012 3:18 PM
Re: Radio Confronts EAS Hardware Backlog at Deadline
Even if a station receives its unit in December, the new system won't be up and running until the following December [or later]. There are no state plans in place, just a bunch of localities. Real time waster...like IBOC...great for the equipment manufacturers, not so much for broadcasters.
By Ready already on
6/26/2012 11:27 AM
Re: Radio Confronts EAS Hardware Backlog at Deadline
The comment from Barely Legal is off the mark. We need to have our CAP equipment by June 30th, and the new IPAWS system is already operating - we're already polling CAP with our dasdec and we're hearing that weather alerts will come by August. And, I was happy to that they were able to deliver our CAP dasdec in just about two weeks from when we placed the order. Not sure how this CAP thing is going to shake out in the end, but at least we've got the dasdec in place so the fcc boys can't ding us, at least on that.