12/20/2012 6:21 PM
U.S. FM stations won the
ability about three years ago to seek higher digital power injection levels.
I’ve been working on a story about that for a pending Radio World “eBook”
project. One source asked not to be identified but provided some interesting
insights so I’ll share them here instead.
long-time believer in IBOC; and at his broadcast company, new FM RF
installations are being built with an ultimate –10 dBc operation level in view,
even though most are currently at –14 with a few exceptions sprinkled in. I
asked him how he would characterize the general success of higher power so far,
“The implementation has been slower than the
FCC expected and about on pace with what I would have expected,” he told me.
“When the power levels were first authorized, many stations could not
participate because of the expense. Since that time Harris, Nautel and ERI have
developed solutions that make high-power IBOC affordable.”
He says digital operation at 14 dB below carrier definitely brings digital
coverage closer to the analog, and improves indoor reception, as its advocates
have hoped. “The biggest improvement is decreased blending at the edge of
coverage and indoor penetration.”
I wondered how much
extra digital power is enough to make a real difference in digital radio
performance. He replied, “With digital, even a 1 dB increase can make the
difference between 100% high-quality reception and none. The iBiquity system as
designed at –20 was predicted to deliver a similar coverage to the analog;
however, the FCC and consulting firms had no information as to the prevailing
noise levels in the FM band, and when the system was actually implemented, it
was found that the noise levels were significantly higher than were used to
For fixed reception, he said, 3, 2 or
even 1 dB can make a difference, and for mobile 6 dB makes a big improvement.
“Ultimately,” he said, “we need –10 dBc as an across-the-board
level except in limited number of situations.” But he’s not a fan of
asymmetrical sidebands, calling this “a prophylactic consideration” to deal
with errors in interference studies done by NPR Labs. In his view, –14 dBc is
just an interim step.
I’ll have more about digital power
levels in our latest Radio World eBook, to be published shortly. Meantime, share any comments
at firstname.lastname@example.org, or post a comment below.
1 comment(s) so far...
By Michael Payne on
12/24/2012 7:07 PM
Re: Building at –14, Planning for –10
Shouldn't this have read -10 instead? :
He says digital operation at 14 dB below carrier definitely brings digital coverage closer to the analog, and improves indoor reception, as its advocates have hoped.
There was a study done that said -12 was optimum.
This allowed both analog and digital to exist with
minimal side effects.