Ouch: 21 to 9

Amendment may signal the ultimate outcome
Author:
Publish date:
Social count:
0



Twenty-one representatives on the House Judiciary Committee sided with performers and record labels today, with only nine coming down on the side of radio.

NAB sounds pretty confident it has the votes in the big chamber to fend off its latest boogeyman under the bed, namely a performance royalty. But I think you can sense where things are going on the Hill by the success of an amendment from John Conyers to structure a royalty so that smaller stations don't get whomped as much as had been feared. I suspect that approach will find a lot of favor among legislators who are unsettled by the idea that broadcasters should get a free pass on this whole issue.

(Conyers offered up a sliding fee scale under which the lowest-grossing stations would pay $500 each year. That kind of number is going to make it harder for the smallest broadcasters to argue they'll go out of business if a royalty passes.)

Broadcasters had best not be counting their chickens just yet, despite the bipartisan support NAB said it sensed in the opposition even in losing this round.

Related

Upcoming Events(9)

31 March–2 April 2008: IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, Las Vegas, Nevada1–3 April 2008: Tower Technology Summit, Las Vegas, Nevada5–8 April 2008: SIB, Rimini, Italy9–11 April 2008: Association of Christian Broadcasters (ACB) Conference, Cape Town, South Africa9–12 April

The NAB Term Sheet: Sticking Up for a Tough Sell

Paul McLane is Radio World U.S. editor in chief.The NAB is taking friendly fire right now from some members and others who disagree with its strategy on the performance royalty issue. Those disagreements are understandable, given the sensitivity of the