New York State AG Sues FCC Over Proposed Net Neutrality Rules

Schneiderman is leading a coalition of 22 States’ Attorneys General in filing a multistate lawsuit to block the Federal Communications Commission’s rollback of net neutrality
Publish date:

NEW YORK � New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman is leading a coalition of 22 States� Attorneys General in filing a multistate lawsuit to block the Federal Communications Commission�s rollback of net neutrality. The coalition filed a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, thus formally commencing a lawsuit against the FCC and the federal government. Read the petition here.�

According to the petition, the repeal of net neutrality would have �dire consequences for consumers and businesses� in New York and across the country that rely on a free and open internet � allowing internet service providers to block certain content, charge consumers more to access certain sites, and throttle or slow the quality of content from content providers that don�t pay more, according to Schneiderman�s press release.

�An open internet � and the free exchange of ideas it allows � is critical to our democratic process,� said Schneiderman, in the same press release. �The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers � allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online. This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet.�

A.G. Schneiderman�s office asserts that under the Administrative Procedure Act, the FCC cannot make �arbitrary and capricious� changes to existing policies such as net neutrality. The FCC�s new rule �fails to justify the commission�s departure from its long-standing policy and practice of defending net neutrality, while misinterpreting and disregarding critical record evidence on industry practices and harm to consumers and businesses.� Moreover, the rule wrongly reclassifies broadband internet as a Title I information service, rather than a Title II telecommunications service, based on an erroneous and unreasonable interpretation of the Telecommunications Act, according to Scheiderman�s office. Finally, the rule improperly and unlawfully includes sweeping preemption of state and local laws.


Net Neutrality Fight Heats Up promo image

Net Neutrality Fight Heats Up

Montana and New York governors recently signed executive orders declaring that telecom providers with state contracts must abide by net neutrality principles

Cloud Computing Carries Risks, Lloyds of London and AIR Say promo image

The End of Net Neutrality? Not So Fast

The commission must still finalize the wording of the order to repeal net neutrality rules and then it must obtain approval from both the Office of Management and Budget and Government Accountability Office