Reader’s Forum
Reader's Forum
Letter: We Are Much More at Risk Now
More commentary about our discussion of Carrington events
Reader's Forum
Letter: We Already Had a Carrington-Style Event
The 1972 solar storm was in the same basic order of magnitude
Reader's Forum
Letter: GroundLinx Innovation?
Buyers do not normally want to spend the money to install such systems
Reader's Forum
Letter: Lump Sum Decision a “No Brainer” for Most Stations
Most syndication providers on SES-11 are staying put or changing frequencies to a transponder...
Reader's Forum
Letter: WWV Is Nice But Not All That Critical
Except for WWVB there really isn’t a great need for HF time signals anymore
Guest Commentaries
More Thoughts on What ATSC 3.0 Can Teach Radio
Alan Hughes responds to Dan Slentz’s musings
Reader's Forum
Letter: AM Migration Is Still a Good Idea
Lower FM band still offers the simplest solution to revitalize AM stations
Reader's Forum
Letter: Richard Fry on Part 15 AM Coverage Area
The signal can go much farther than 200 feet without violating the rules
Reader's Forum
Letter: AM Is Simple, Digital Is Overly Complicated
What's wrong with Class B modulators and Class C RF amps anyway?
Reader's Forum
Letter: Helping Sisters High School With a Three-Hop Marti
Graduates, families could tune to KNLX and listen while watching from their cars
Reader's Forum
Letter: Don’t Shrug Off Benefits of AM Band in Digital
More feedback on Frank Karkota's commentary
Guest Commentaries
Letter to the Editor: AM Stereo Is Still an Option
Want revitalization? Mandate AM stereo in any FM stereo radio.
Guest Commentaries
Begging to Differ on Part 15 Regulations
Bill DeFelice has some questions for Larry Wilkins
Reader's Forum
Reader’s Forum: Bring Back Radio’s “Unbridled Imagination”
Discourage corporate ownership for mom and pop independents
Columns and Views
Honk Your Horn Means “Amen” for KVHH(LP)’s Drive-In Church
California LPFM steps in to bring Sunday services to congregation following social distancing recommendations...
Reader's Forum
Reader’s Forum: Purge the Airwaves of Misinformation
Rolf Taylor feels the FCC needs to step in to keep the COVID discussion...
Columns and Views
Reader Letters on C. Crane, Modulation, EAS Costs
Good article about a good radio (“C. Crane Offers Up a Premium Portable,” Dec....
Columns and Views
AM in Digital? It’s a Tech Solution to the Wrong Problem
Dave Kolesar sees digital transmission as the salvation of the AM band (Dec. 4,...
Columns and Views
Reader Shares Late Issue Concerns
Another gives feedback on Tom Vernon's latest feature series
Columns and Views
It’s Not All Glass
Dear Editor, I just got to read the Sept. 25 issue and would like...
Columns and Views
Readers Comment on Engineering Extinction
The following comments were about the column “Are You Doing Your Part” in the...
Columns and Views
Letters: AM Doesn’t Have to Go Away
It provides important services though some operators are negligent
Columns and Views
The NRSC Proof Debate Rages On
More reactions to Larry Langford’s comments about removing AM proof requirements.
Columns and Views
Readers Respond to PSA Suggestions, Piracy’s Roots, C4 and More
Letters offer more industry insight
Columns and Views
Readers Write in About Translators and a Map Error
Warren Schulz and Richard Strack weigh in on recent articles
Columns and Views
More on Dealing With Multipath
A reader writes in with his own experiences of the phenomenon
Columns and Views
What Does Your Modern Homebrew Look Like?
And this reader says digital and analog radio are like oil and water
Columns and Views
Reader Letters: Main Studio, Right to Repair, More
AM REVITALIZATION Responding to Mark Fowler’s commentary “Revitalization and Interference: Fact vs. Science Fiction”...
Columns and Views
Readers Value Their Right to Repair
Steve Johnston’s commentary in the April 26 issue generated strong response
