Reader’s Forum

More reactions to Larry Langford’s comments about removing AM proof requirements.

Letters offer more industry insight

Warren Schulz and Richard Strack weigh in on recent articles

A reader writes in with his own experiences of the phenomenon

And this reader says digital and analog radio are like oil and water

Readers react to a wide variety of articles

AM REVITALIZATION Responding to Mark Fowler’s commentary “Revitalization and Interference: Fact vs. Science Fiction”...

Letters explore a variety of topics

There are two sides to every issue, even with translators

Also question the FCC's position on mandates

Steve Johnston’s commentary in the April 26 issue generated strong response

A reader remembers the “old reliables”

Several articles resonated with RW readers

RW loves it when readers join the discussion

These subjects are perennial favorites

The RWEE mailbox received two thoughtful letters this month from longtime friends of the...

Readers write in about stories they read in RW Engineering Extra

Readers write in to keep us straight!

The following reader comments were posted in response to Evan Brown’s commentary “You’re Leaving...

Readers write in about HD Radio, remember David Hultsman

Readers debate the roles of LPFM, Class A

Debates about royalties and community radio share space with Ampex memories

Share reactions to LPFM developments, public file comments and more

Readers give their thoughts on online public files and more

Readers responded to our headlines, big and small

We hear reactions to stories covering NRSC, routing, LPFM and much more

Readers told us what they thought about various regulations

We received letters about recent issues of note

Readers wrote in to tell us what they thought about the BBG, AM revitalization...